Aware IM User Forums

I have had a similar problem before where rules need to be controlled in their execution and I used an attribute with a number. IF BO.Check was changed to 10 then xyz BO.Check=20 IF BO.Check was changed to 20 then abc BO.Check=30 Then your process can be called or stopped if BO.Check doesn't get to ...

Implemented as DISPLAY BO WHERE X,Y,Z USING QueryName What exactly is implemented? I can't remember the initial FR and now when reading it through, I don't fully understand what is implemented and how it works. Is this new functionality documented and possibly with an example somewhere? DISPLAY whe...

Implemented as DISPLAY BO WHERE X,Y,Z USING QueryName

Implemented in build 3265

No technical solutions but the Jakarta-poi Jar is 1.5.1 and was shipped in 2002.

In all likelihood there are probably a number of improvements between then and now that could be leveraged.

The ability to take n BO and cross join these to one table without manually finding each and creating individual rows. I have multiple instances where the user creates 3 business objects which may have between 1 and n instances and then needs to be able to interrogate the combination at a later date...

Looks like a TAKE BEST does not put 3 records in context, but puts all records in context?? TAKE BEST isn’t working because your first process This is my example process: FIND ALL AnObject //this BO contains 6 records AnObject.TryNr=0 //set everything to zero Has brought every AnObject into context...

What happens if you change the EmailTemplate.Message to just be plain text. If the OutgoingEmail.Message is HTML should it not just pickup the formatted text?

https://www.awareim.com/dokuwiki/doku.p ... nside_tags

You have to place double chevrons << >> around rules in html

Here’s the link to the discussion on reverse proxies

https://awareim.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=11981

I’m not sure I understand the issue fully, but would using a reverse proxy not fix this? As all traffic would go to acme.example.org and the reverse proxy would direct them to the correct private server.

Create another attribute on Parent called psEnabledRecord

You can dispense with the yes no attribute and instead use a button to insert the Child into psEnabledRecord.

Then if a child record != Parent.psEnabledRecord it is uneditable.

See Rule Properties / Dynamic

I think you are going to have difficulty in fixing this due to there being two competing changes to the BO, via the UI and via a rule watching an external relationship. Perhaps put the comment and description into a peer single relationship with the Transaction which would allow the comment to be ch...