Aware IM User Forums

But if I'm not going to use that, is there any reason to not just have a Document field and store EVERYTHING in there? All images are documents but not all documents are images. Does specifying Picture limit what can be stored more easily than the Document attribute? Haven't used so don't know the ...

Feature request outstanding from 2017

https://awareim.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... ght#p44740

Cool, can that be modified to use a BO attribute so you can vary the date easily?

To add to Jaymer’s comment, AIM is already creating the third intermediate table so you might as well go the extra mile and make the additional table functionally available. Your queries become a lot simpler too.

One thing to be mindful of when using Y/N fields is that ere are technically three options for the field: Y, N & NULL When writing processes involving Y/N I use a positive and an inverse state check on the state that is relevant, so if I want the process to run when the attribute is No, then I check...

Have you changed versions of MySQL? Version 8 is case sensitive whereas prior version were not.

If you are using Appointment BOs via a procedure and need to generate recurring appointments then you need to be able to set the RecRule attribute and it isn't always straightforward.

Here is a RecRule generator to define what the rule should be https://icalendar.org/rrule-tool.html

I have had a similar problem before where rules need to be controlled in their execution and I used an attribute with a number. IF BO.Check was changed to 10 then xyz BO.Check=20 IF BO.Check was changed to 20 then abc BO.Check=30 Then your process can be called or stopped if BO.Check doesn't get to ...

Implemented as DISPLAY BO WHERE X,Y,Z USING QueryName What exactly is implemented? I can't remember the initial FR and now when reading it through, I don't fully understand what is implemented and how it works. Is this new functionality documented and possibly with an example somewhere? DISPLAY whe...

Implemented as DISPLAY BO WHERE X,Y,Z USING QueryName

Implemented in build 3265

No technical solutions but the Jakarta-poi Jar is 1.5.1 and was shipped in 2002.

In all likelihood there are probably a number of improvements between then and now that could be leveraged.

The ability to take n BO and cross join these to one table without manually finding each and creating individual rows. I have multiple instances where the user creates 3 business objects which may have between 1 and n instances and then needs to be able to interrogate the combination at a later date...

Looks like a TAKE BEST does not put 3 records in context, but puts all records in context?? TAKE BEST isn’t working because your first process This is my example process: FIND ALL AnObject //this BO contains 6 records AnObject.TryNr=0 //set everything to zero Has brought every AnObject into context...

What happens if you change the EmailTemplate.Message to just be plain text. If the OutgoingEmail.Message is HTML should it not just pickup the formatted text?