Aware IM User Forums

Hi Mark, Is the 'EDIT BO' action the last one in your process, or is that followed by any subsequent process steps? As explained in the user manual regarding the 'single tab mode' for processes, by default all intermediate process operations are performed in a popup window. The first and all subsequ...

It seems that the implementation on the basis of 'DISPLAY BO WHERE X,Y,Z USING QueryName' is not yet fully equal to defining a separate query that contains the same search criteria. I found that any applicability conditions that are defined for row operations and (most likely) the presentation rules...

I've never had this issue. I use Render script. That is probably why you didn't have the issue: because you are using a render script, the filter is applied after the grid is rendered. I was referring to the situation where the filter is put in the initialization script, therefore before the grid i...

I noticed that when using the technique of layering layouts (using DISPLAY LAYOUT), you can't use the AwareApp.getPanelId function (as described here and here . The aware JS code has a comment to this function: "Not to be used when a panel belongs to a perspective displayed using DISPLAY LAYOUT - se...

I came across a small bug in the filter function (event listener) in the AwareApp_QueryLayoutParser (I believe part of the 'setupEvents' method). Below I will describe when the issue occurs, quote the parser code where the problem likely is, describe a temporary work-around and make a few suggestion...

In V9, you can choose between two styles for the left menu bar: "MODERN" and "CLASSIC". The Modern style is with the large icons. The Classic style is with small icons to the left next to the menu text. This is close to second picture that you posted. Setting is in the properties for the Visual Pers...

Edit: made a small change in the code, because the static initialization block was not recognized by the tool MinifyAll.

If there would be some hesitation to allow users to make direct changes to the documentation itself, it would also help if users could make comments/additions to the documentation, which would then be displayed below the official documentation. See for example the MariaDB Server Documentation https:...

Reference is made to the issue flagged in this post . While this can be solved by a custom render script for the grid as explained here , I suggest to adjust the parser script in such way that inline edits are saved first (and any resulting BO rules are executed), before the row operation is execute...

Meanwhile, I have been working on a slightly different approach: catching the mouseclick event in the render script of the grid, syncing the grid and then invoking the row operation as normal. This is because I already have a render script for other reasons, and in this way I can keep all the Javas...

As explained in this post , the current (as of v9.0 build 3272) Aware parser for grids saves the edits made in a grid with inline editing when a row operation for that grid is invoked, but the save process is an asynchronous process running simultaneous with the process for the row operation. This m...

Thanks. It seems that the line "int count = 0;" should be "let count = 0;" or "var count = 0;" as 'int' is not a valid keyword in Javascript. Meanwhile, I have been working on a slightly different approach: catching the mouseclick event in the render script of the grid, syncing the grid and then inv...

I know for a fact that the rules of the object are NOT executed automatically when a row operation is invoked. Strictly speaking, yes. Invoking the row operation does not in itself result in execution of the object rules. However, the situation is different when the row operation is on a grid with ...

I had a look in the queryLayoutParser.js file, which confirmed what I had suspected. See code below copied from that file (lines 5044-5069 in v9.0 build 3272): runItemOperation: function (link) { var link = $(link); // operation is in a special attribute of the link var operIdx = link.attr ("data-op...

I did as suggested. I already had a similar 'dummy' process which I had called 'Void' - I needed this in some other areas. That process has just one rule, but that rule is disabled. The process has no I then created another row operation "Start process" which calls this 'Void' process. And believe i...